Friday 26 August 2016

La Goutte d'Or, Paris, France, August2016 - Revisiting an ethnic enclave

The Goutte d’Or district of Paris got its name from the white wine (the ‘drop of gold’) that used to be made there.  Zola set his novel l’Assommoir here with Gervaise and Lantier, as poor migrants from Marseille, arriving in the rapidly-growing district to take up occupations as a washerwoman and a roofer – and watching the growing wealth of the rest of the city from their slum apartment.  The history of the Goutte d’Or is the history of migration into Paris – in the post-war years Berbers from Algeria, Haïtians, people from France’s West Indian départements, migrants from the French speaking countries of sub-Saharan Africa, and most recently a few Tamils and Sri Lankans.  Today to many Parisians the Goutte d’Or is a ‘no-go’ area associated with Islamicisation, drugs, petty crime and a general air of danger.  For tourists, Trip Adviser ranks it as 815th in its list of ‘things to do in Paris’, out of a total of 995 ‘sights’, although the French-language ‘Routard’ guide web site does suggest a visit to the district but in its secondary list of interesting neighbourhoods.

I got to know the area well in the 1980s and the 1990s, and wrote about it in several articles and book chapters I published at the time – as one of the most iconic migrant districts of a modern European city.  I have just been back to revisit the area after a gap of several years. 

It is undeniable that in the 1980s the Goutte d’Or had some of the worst housing conditions in Paris.  City council plans passed in 1983 envisaged massive slum clearance programmes and the construction of modern blocks of social housing flats.  The plans also envisaged the transformation of the petty commerce of the area into something more modern.  A striking feature of the planning documents of the period was the absence in the artists’ illustrations of the future of any sign of the North or Black African presences that dominated the area: all the new residents and users of the district were to be white, and generally young, with no-one in the exotic dress of the Togolese or Cameroonians (male or female), no one wearing the Islamic veil, and no old Berber men leaning on their sticks.  The image was of the ‘reclamation’ (perhaps it was to be the ‘reconquest’) of the area by majority white French society.

But the local representative in the National Assembly – Lionel Jospin, a distinguished member of the socialist party who later rose to be Prime Minister – ensured that existing local interests in the neighbourhood were strongly involved in the renovation projects, especially along the rue de la Goutte d’Or itself.  The degree of sensitivity to the needs and interests of the immigrant (‘ethnic minority’ being a phrase that is not acceptable in France) communities has been unusual.  The Socialists have continuously represented the area, including the period between 1993 and 1997 when this was the only Socialist-held National Assembly seat in the whole of Paris.  Some (but by no means all) of the slums are now gone, but the level of population displacement that has occurred has been relatively small.  Yes: there are elements of gentrification but they are few.  Nevertheless it seems to me that there have been profound changes in the Goutte d’Or that have come about organically through competition between different groups.  Something of an ethnographic description of my recent visits may illuminate what the Goutte d’Or is like today, how it has changed, and what remains the same.

Streets in the Goutte d'Or (taken from a Michelin map)

It is a Wednesday so I start off by walking the length of the market held twice a week (Saturday morning is the other occasion) under the tracks of metro line 2 (the métro aérienne).  It is much as I remembered it – although less crowded (it is August and, as usual in this month, the ‘real bits’ of Paris – not the tourist areas – seem half empty).  The mix of stalls is familiar – fruit and vegetables, meat (but no pork), fish, clothes and shoes at very cheap prices, minor pieces of hardware and household equipment.  There is one stall selling ‘artisanal honey’ but it seems out of place.  I am one of the few whites present.  Stallholders are calling their wares – many of them using Arabic to do so.  The dominant clientele is North African, with a number of elderly couples shopping together although much of the food purchasing is being done by the men: there are some ‘black’ Africans present but not as many as I will see later. 

Twenty-five years ago there used to be what was known as a ‘thieves’ market’ (marché aux voleurs) on the same spot in the early evening most days.  I am surprised to come across something of the same happening mid-morning on the bridge over the main railway lines into the Gare du Nord.  Several people have laid out a few odd items on the ground – a bottle of hand cream, a watch, a child’s jumper, a small packet of tissues - and a few passers-by pause to see what is on offer.  But later on the same day, after the market has gone, I find much stronger informal trading going on, just as it did in the past, under the metro arches just east of Barbès-Rochechouart station.  And there is a big crowd involved.  Why three police officers have decided to arrest one youth rather than questioning many of the others is not clear to me.  I have always suspected that much of what is for sale is not actually stolen but ‘retrieved’ from skips and rubbish being thrown out, or consists of items being sold singly having been bought in bulk.

On the corner of the rue de Tombouctou two hammams face each other – but whilst that for women is obviously open and active, that for men is closed and seems to have been so for some time.  I set off up rue de Chartres, beyond the upper end of which the Sacré Cœur basilica establishes a Christian presence looking down on an otherwise Islamic neighbourhood.  But both early in the morning and later in the day, at what has always been the busiest time (between six and eight in the evening), I am surprised how few people there are around.  I have memories of street sellers offering bundles of mint for fresh tea; of goods being piled in the street outside food shops without window displays; of big groups of old men leaning on their sticks, watching the passers-by and involved in long and deep discussions; and of a constant bustle of activity and crowds.  I remember being one of the few whites on the street.  Everything now seems watered down – almost sanitised in the way those slum clearance plans of the 1980s envisaged.  Yes: most people on the street are North African (although there are a few Tamils too), but there are also single young white women walking through on their way from office jobs, earphones in place as they follow the soundtrack of their lives.  In rue des Gardes there are new designer clothing shops, obviously part of a planning initiative since they all have street signs in the same style, and at least one of these is run by a Portuguese.  (The Sicilian tailor who used to have a small workshop in the next road has disappeared.)  But the Ammar butchers that used to have sheep heads in its display cabinet is still there – although the display is now of chicken.

Boucherie Ammar in rue de la Goutte d'Or - August 2016

Here and there throughout this southern end of the district there are infills of new buildings replacing the old slums, particularly on rue de la Goutte d’Or, but the overall built feel of the quarter seems unchanged – there has been little remodelling of roads and the constructions (although presenting a texture of concrete instead of brick to the world) are in keeping with the massing of the slums they replaced – but seem likely to be labelled slums themselves within a few decades.  And one nice development is of a well-equipped but small urban park on the rue Léon, where I remember some of the worst slum housing of the district.

As I walk north I notice much greater changes.  I remember this as an area of great diversity – a mixture of North African and West African residents and commerce, along with some white French, particularly along the two streets with impressive Haussmannian housing and paired names – rue de Suez and rue de Panama.  I occasionally visited a small Turkish restaurant in rue Myrha.  Whilst the western edge of this area, near boulevard Barbès, was always busy, the north-eastern area, towards rue Stephenson (named after the British railway-builder) was much quieter and more residential (and had some of the worst slums).

What strikes me most is that this whole area now moves to an Afro-Caribbean rhythm.  Looking at French web sites since my visit I find they refer to it as an ‘African’ area – but it is more than that: there is plenty of commerce that labels itself as ‘Haïtian’ or ‘Antillais’ (referring to France’s Caribbean possessions): I will stick with the Afro-Caribbean label, even though it is not a concept that would be recognised locally.

Certainly there is a new large Islamic centre at the northern end of rue Stephenson which brings a crowd of male predominantly North Africans to the street at the time of evening prayers.  But the cafés opposite are Afro-Caribbean run.  This Islamic centre is an important response, supported by the local administration, to the previous problem of an under-provision of prayer facilities locally which, in the past, had led to rue Polonceau further south having to be closed for Friday prayers to allow worshippers at the mosque there to spill out and set up their prayer mats in the road.  An imam was shot in rue Myrha in 1995, apparently for refusing to support the translation of jihad to France, and I wonder how that assassination is now thought of in the area – but that’s a question for another time.  One other thing I notice in rue Stephenson, and again this indicates some ‘official’ concern for the Goutte d’Or, is a group of older women waiting at a bus stop: there was no bus service within the Goutte d’Or when I got to know it 25 years ago.

Every other street I stroll along in the northern part of the quarter which actually makes up 75% of it – is now effectively ‘black’.  In the early evening where further south there were a few whites, here there are none other than me.   And the most interesting thing to me is the way things are being sold.  Yes: there are shops – many of which indicate that they are specialists in one product but which actually cover a peculiar diversity of goods.  But it is the street selling that is most notable.  A stretch of over 200 metres of rue des Poissonniers is occupied by individuals selling aubergines, or shirts, or particularly sweetcorn, from a couple of boxes one standing on its side supporting the other.  And on the corner of rue Poulet (‘Chicken Street’) there are perhaps 20 women selling individual items in this way.  But this does not have the feel of the ‘thieves’ market’ at Barbès metro.  For a start there are more women than men selling, and there is none of the feel of subversion that is pervasive further south.  And in addition to the street sellers there are men who have improvised barbecues for corn-on-the-cob in supermarket trolleys, with glowing charcoal in a large tin at the front and the yet-to-be-cooked corn behind.  And they are doing a good trade.

Street trading in rue des Poissonniers - August 2016

Strictly speaking the permanent market in the rue Dejean lies outside the Goutte d’Or quarter but functionally it is an essential element of the neighbourhood.  This is the place now where North Africa meets the Afro-Caribbean world.  And I know from press reports that it has been a place of some tension.  Indeed in the morning I see something of that when I come across a fight between several men – apparently set off by a knocked-over crate of figs.  This market (the stalls are actually extensions of the shops into the street) used to have a mixture of stallholders including white French – and the customers were similarly mixed.  Today it is entirely dominated by communities of migrant origin, but I watch as Islamic women wearing the veil buy meat from stalls that advertise the halal nature of their offerings but which also sell pork steaks.  Several stalls specialise in varieties of fish one doesn’t normally see in a French market and the customers for these are almost exclusively Afro-Caribbean.  Down the middle of the market there are, as elsewhere in the early evening, the impromptu stalls set up by those selling single products – generally fruit or vegetables. 

Throughout this part of the neighbourhood there are signs, flags, posters and other indications of the diversity of regional origins of those present. Togo, Mali, the Congo, Cameroon, Haïti, Martinique, the Comores, Chad and other French-speaking areas are all indicated – and I can hear more French in retail transactions than I could in the market under the Barbès metro line in the morning.  But I also see signs proclaiming Ghanaian, Gambian and other West African origins from areas that were never French colonies.  The travel agent’s window on rue des Poissonniers is entirely taken up with well-ordered notices comparing the prices offered by major airlines to a huge diversity of African destinations, each embellished with the flag of the country concerned.  And on the corner with rue de Suez I notice a pharmacy (actually it calls itself a ‘parapharmacy’ which possibly means the staff are not fully qualified) specialising in products for ‘peaux noirs ou métisses’ (‘black or mixed race skins’).  The only non-Afro-Caribbean elements here are one or two small shops run by Chinese, and a few Tamil street sellers or porters of goods on barrows (although the delivery lorry that blocks the street for some minutes has a white driver).

My final stretch back to the metro takes me down rue des Poissonniers onto boulevard Barbès.  My memory is of two dominant kinds of goods for sale along here – jewellery, and luggage.  What has happened today to all those shops selling the brightest gold necklaces, bangles and rings, all in 24 carat (but therefore soft) gold?  Such jewellery was an investment rather than to be worn everyday, and the purchasers were predominantly North African.  Where I remember a dozen or more such shops there are now only a couple left.  On the other hand there are still several luggage retailers, but once again fewer than I knew 25 years ago.  (I bought a cheap folding canvas hold-all here then which is still as good as new, and known to my family as the ‘Goutte d’Or bag’.)  But what is new are the mobile phone shops – particularly offering deals with Lycamobile which specialises in cheap international calls.  I lose count of such shops on my way down to the metro. 

We are now some decades beyond the period when most migrants from North and West Africa arrived in France.  To what extent have telephone conversations supplanted, or simply augmented, visits back to family in Africa taking remittances back in the form of gold jewellery?  Would the links today to Bamako, or Conakry, or Abidjan be as strong now if it were not for the mobile phone?  Certainly a lot of people in the streets are talking on their mobiles as they walk, but I don’t know who, or where, they are talking to.

Finally, back on boulevard de la Chapelle near the evening ‘thieves’ market’ I come across a couple of very up-market designer dress shops offering the smartest of occasion wear for the Islamic woman – but the assistants are outside talking as they have no clients.  Have they missed a trick in setting up here in what I observe as the declining North African market of the Goutte d’Or instead of in St Denis or another suburb?  And as I climb the steps to the metro I realise that after a day spent in the neighbourhood I have only been offered one slip of paper offering me the assistance of a marabout or sorcerer who can guarantee me success in my exams, the defeat of my enemies, and cures for any sexual problems I may have.  Twenty or thirty years ago I would have collected a dozen or more such slips in the course of a single hour’s visit.

The Goutte d’Or is a complex area with a fascinating history and sociological profile.  I have only scratched the surface in a day spent back there after a gap of many years.  And I have a lot of unanswered questions in my mind about what has happened during that period, and why.  If asked in 1990 I would have called it a mixed neighbourhood with a dominantly North African area in the south.  Today the Afro-Caribbean elements seem, to me at least, to be dominant, with the North African declining.  But it hasn’t changed as much as was envisaged in those city plans of the 1980s for its redevelopment.  Indeed, an image of the Goutte d’Or as an ‘immigrant’ district is probably a permanent feature in the mental maps of most Parisians.  To many it almost certainly remains terra incognita in real life – known through reputation and media reports rather than experienced through the soles of the feet as I have just done.



Monday 15 August 2016

London Docklands, August 2016 - Economic change and the landscape

As I have mentioned before (in a blog of October 2015), I was brought up in west London where the wider world flew over my house daily in the guise of planes landing at Heathrow.  Underground trains from my local station on the District Line passed through the centre of London and headed out east, but I never stayed on them beyond my school stop (Ravenscourt Park) or one of the stations in what is now Zone 1 of the London system. I scarcely knew the eastern part of London at all.

I suppose that at the time London’s docklands were the powerhouse of the city – and one of the driving forces of the UK economy.  We learned all about that in geography at school, where we had to draw maps labelled with the various docks and the goods they handled.  Some of the names were evocative of empire and royalty – East India, West India, George V, Victoria, Royal Albert, Surrey Commercial (with different basins named for Canada, Quebec, Greenland and so on), Milwall, St Katharine’s, and London Dock itself.   The fact that I didn’t explore the docks themselves didn’t mean that I knew nothing of them.  Events there often made the headlines in the London Evening News, ‘events’ particularly involving strikes led by Jack Dash, a communist trades union leader who has posthumously been credited with trebling dockers’ wages between 1949 and 1972.  One of my visits to the docks was actually brought about by a seamens’ (rather than dockers’) strike when with my parents we drove all the way across to the Royal Docks one Sunday afternoon in 1966 to see immobilised ships stacked right across the dock.

My other early direct images of London’s Docklands are few.  We had a school trip to Greenwich which involved a hired boat downstream from near the Tower of London, passing all the wharves while they were still working.  Like many others of my age I retain the image of the cranes lining the Pool of London (between Tower and London Bridges) dipping as the funeral barge of Winston Churchill passed by in January 1965.  I once visited an older cousin who was a serving merchant seaman on a vessel that had come into the Royal Albert dock.  With a friend I went to see Sir Francis Chichester’s ‘Gypsy Moth IV’ moored at St Katharine’s dock in late 1967 after his return from his solo circumnavigation of the globe.  In retrospect I suppose that was an early stage in St Katharine’s becoming basically a pleasure dock.  And with that same friend we drove once to Wapping to visit the ‘Prospect of Whitby’ pub, paying the going rate of sixpence each to the local dockers’ children to ‘protect your car, mister’.

A photo I took near Wapping in 1965.


 Despite living in Sheffield, I now visit London’s old docklands quite frequently.   There are certain comparisons to be made with the Newcastle quayside that I blogged about in March of this year. In both London and Newcastle the old working-class employment in the docks has gone.  Both areas have become strong middle-class residential enclaves. 

But there are also big differences.  In particular, in Newcastle almost all the old quayside buildings have been swept away to be replaced by new constructions.   The western part of the London Docklands has instead seen the retention, refurbishment and improvement of a significant proportion of the historic dock buildings.  And to these have been added a range of new constructions – some of which have merit in reproducing the massing and feel of the old.  (Others do not – the old Design Museum in Bermondsey, created by Terence Conran, sadly being one of them.)  One significant difference between Newcastle and London is that along the Tyne boats tied up to a quayside and goods were then moved into warehouses set back from the river, while along the Thames there was direct traffic from ships into wharf buildings that abutted the river itself. 

I have just walked the stretch from Tower Bridge to Rotherhithe along the south bank of the river, crossing under the Thames on the paradoxically-named ‘Overground’ to Wapping and then walking back along the north shore.  What an atmospheric walk that is now.  First Shad Thames – a narrow cobbled canyon running between high brick-built warehouse buildings that have been converted into apartments.  Then along Butlers Wharf by the river to St Saviour’s Dock – a long muddy inlet where the cranes still stand proudly on the warehouses that are now flats.  On along Bermondsey Wall with a mix of old and new buildings, then the Angel and the Mayflower pubs – the latter on the site where the Pilgrim Fathers left London for the New World.  And to the centuries old houses and church of Rotherhithe village, and the museum and works associated with Brunel’s digging of the first tunnel under the river (now occupied by the Overground line). 

Then back west from Wapping station along Wapping High Street, where a very fine set of warehouses look straight out onto the river.  In the 1840s one of my  ancestors was married from a pub along here – a seaman from Gateshead who was probably employed on a boat bringing Northumbrian coal for London hearths.  The noble lock-keepers’ houses at the former Wapping entrance to the London Docks are still there,  but the dock itself has been filled in and is now a sports pitch. At St Katharine’s Dock many of the original warehouses have been retained, and most of the newer infills are in keeping with these – the exception being the Guoman Tower Hotel, a ziggurat-like monolith of brick that must surely be the ugliest new construction on the Thames over the last 40 years, and in a prestige location next to Tower Bridge, more’s the pity. (Although I can attest that there are great views from the rooms in the hotel, from some of which much of the appalling building itself is hidden.)

Wapping today - at a spot near the earlier photograph

Further east from my morning walk, of course, lie the old Surrey Docks - now mostly housing. And then the northern part of the Isle of Dogs is taken up by the excitement of the Canary Wharf complex, with the watery dock basins providing relief and open space between the high rise of the financial office buildings and associated service operations that create a mass of skyscrapers dwarfing the thousands of business-suited employees that  throng the old dock sides and the stations of the toytown-like Docklands Light Railway  in its red livery – the traditional colour of London’s public transport.  And to the east again there is London City Airport with its runway along the side of the dock where, in the 1960s, I went to visit my cousin’s ship with its refrigerated cargo of New Zealand lamb.

In total there is almost nothing left of the economy of the Docks of when I was a child.  The irony of Jack Dash’s success in raising the wages of the dockers and stevedores (there was a clear trades union distinction between the two, the subject itself of strike disputes from time to time) was that just at the time when the dock workers achieved a viable wage the basis of their existence was cut from them by containerisation and the growth of bigger vessels, too large for the Port of London, to accommodate these metal boxes.  When he became a captain my cousin no longer came into London – instead his ship unloaded at Rotterdam.  Felixstowe became the premier port of the UK.  London’s docks fell into disuse remarkably quickly.  But the renaissance of the area followed with little pause.  I say ‘renaissance of the area’ because this brought few new opportunities for those previously employed in the dock industries.  London’s Docklands provide a case-study of de-industrialisation and globalisation and of the replacement of a working-class economy by one with opportunities primarily for an educated young middle-class population, with many of them being internationally mobile.  And so the old dock buildings have become offices, design studios, flats, bars, restaurants, supplemented by new constructions to serve similar functions.

But in one way London’s Docklands mirror today what they were when I drew maps of them in school geography lessons.  Then they were the powerhouse of London, and to some extent of the UK.  Today they are still part of the powerhouse of the city, and increasingly of the UK as a whole.  It’s just that power now lies in very different economic sectors in a post-industrial Britain.

As I made my way back to my hotel near London Bridge after my early morning return walk to Rotherhithe and Wapping I was struck by one further echo of the past.  In The Waste Land T S Eliot wrote:
“Unreal City,
  
Under the brown fog of a winter dawn,

A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,

I had not thought death had undone so many.

Sighs, short and infrequent, were exhaled,

And each man fixed his eyes before his feet.
  
Flowed up the hill and down King William Street,

To where Saint Mary Woolnoth kept the hours

With a dead sound on the final stroke of nine.”

As I approached London Bridge Station from Tower Bridge down the pedestrian street curiously named ‘More London’ from the new Mayoralty past the Ernst and Young (EY) Building and other major offices, Eliot’s words came back to me as I fought against the tide of office workers surging now eastwards towards their desks overlooking the old Pool of London.   It was a few minutes before that ‘dead sound’ of the strike of nine.  The offices of the old square mile of London have expanded eastwards into the dock areas along the river but some things haven’t changed that much – except where Eliot saw only men I now saw a crowd made up half of women.  And that’s something that wouldn’t have been so in the old days of the docks.